Madison Street Capital is a finance company that has won many awards and received many commendations for their track record in several facets of their business

Madison Street Capital Advisors (MSC), a finance company that is based in Chicago, Illinois, has been in business for 13 years. MSC works in many different niches of finance. Some of their areas of specialty include mergers and acquisition-focused services, private equity, advisory, and also tax-related specialties. MSC provides many financial options for both publicly and privately held firms.


Established in 2005 by Charles Botchway and Anthony Marsala, MSC has extensive experience, relationship experience, and key knowledge to compete with the other top middle market investment companies. MSC is placed in very high regards in its industry concerning its specialization in the areas of corporate finance and mergers & acquisitions (M&A).


MSC has a group of professionals with the skills to arrange the right capitalization structure and financing to fit unique client situations. MSC is a firm with a renowned business history and a reputation for excellence in their industry. The skilled employees of MSC are true professionals who are aware of the uniqueness of every business situation that they are part of.


Not only does Madison Street Capital see itself as a company with a comprehensive knowledge base involving corporate finance, but MSC also has an admirable track record in the area of contracts. MSC has a strong history of developing exit strategies for many different companies in the public and private spheres. Staff members at MSC have received accolades and honors from industry groups frequently. And on an annual basis, leading peers, and stakeholders in MSC’s industry query them about their future outlook on things. MSC has provided conditions and market trends for financial areas like hedge funds.


Some of MSC’s key clients include Fiber Science, Bond Medical Group, and Central Iowa Energy. MSC currently has offices in Chicago, Oregon, Ghana, and India. MSC is also a company that prefers to take a worldly approach to corporate finance strategies and business pursuits.


MSC recently worked as the main advisor to DCG Software Value, which is a global leader in software analytics. They successfully merged with the Spitfire Group thanks to the efforts of MSC’s Charles Botchway and managing director Jay Rodgers.


MSC has been recognized with many honors over the years as part of the annual M&A Advisor Awards. The M&A Advisor Awards recognizes the notable achievements of firms in the areas of transactions, restructuring, and corporate finance. Additionally, MSC received commendations for its role in the purchase by Dowco Group of Acuna and Associates. MSC has had other wins as a company with their successful coordination of an equity and debt investment for the firm, ARES Security Corporation. The president of ARES Security Corporation spoke very highly of MSC for their impressive contributions on the deal.


Follow Madison Street Capital on Facebook.

Securus Technologies works to help prisons exploit technology to their advantage

There can be no doubt that the revolution in technology that has taken place over the last 30 years has had major impacts in almost every field of endeavor. This has even been true in the nation’s prison system, where technologies have been successfully employed to improve the safety and security of inmates, guards and the public.


But technology has also proved to be a double-edged sword for those charged with keeping America’s jails and prisons safe. The quick spread of powerful computational devices has meant that prisons have needed to be ever-vigilant of inmates acquiring access to the means of further committing crimes even as they are carrying out long terms of incarceration in high-security complexes. And nowhere has this been made clearer than in the case of illegal cellular devices.


Contraband cellphones first started becoming a major problem throughout the nation’s carceral institutions in the early 2000s. It was around that time that both the price and size of cellphones dropped to such low levels that anyone could afford a cellphone, and they could hide one almost anywhere. These developments led to a flood of illegal cellular devices throughout the nation’s prisons and jails. While the majority of these phones were simply used to circumvent prison communications systems, a threat to institutional safety and security, the real problem arose when the illegal phones found their way into the hands of dangerous and sophisticated leadership of prison gangs. This posed an often-existential threat to the institutions and presented major risks for the safety and security of the general public.


It didn’t take long for gang leaders, who represent some of the most violent and dangerous inmates in the nation, to begin using the phones to wreak mayhem. Witnesses in high-profile cases were often intimidated into not testifying. Prosecutors were threatened and prison employees were even murdered. The gangs were able to carry our these nefarious ends by their highly organized, hierarchic structure, which is often closely modeled after actual military operations. Prison gangs often have the majority of their membership on the outside. But these ex-cons are still sworn to loyalty, carrying out any orders that they receive from leadership. This effective command-and-control structure means that gang leaders with access to effective communications, like that provided by cellphones, can effectively nullify their incarceration, being able to carry out the most heinous and violent crimes just as if they were free to walk the streets.


Now, Securus Technologies has begun the rollout of its Wireless Containment System. The WCS has proven itself capable of nearly completely shutting down all illegal cellular calls taking place within prisons where it is installed. The WCS promises to be a game-changer in the fight against contraband phones, permanently removing one of prison gangs’ biggest tools of mayhem.

Jeremy Goldstein a renowned attorney giving insight about employee compensation.

Jeremy Goldstein is an attorney who has been providing counsel to corporations when it comes to matters concerning employee benefits. A good number of corporations stopped giving their employees stock options in the recent times. Most corporations stop giving employees stock options because they anticipate that the organization’s stocks might drop making it difficult for the employees to execute their options. Also, many of the employees are reluctant due to the fact the in the event of an economic crash; the stock options might become worthless. Also, the stock options are perceived to result in unwanted accounting work making the costs more expensive than the advantages that it poses financially. Stock options may just as well be as good as other compensations like better insurance coverage and the additional wages. If an employee has stock options, they will make it their priority for the company to be successful. This is based on the grounds that their earnings would only increase if the values of the shares for the firm rises. The output of the people working at the company will increase, and existing customers will be more satisfied, more desirable clients will be brought on board, and more innovative services will be provided. It is usually complicated for firms to provide the employees with equity and businesses are also bound to have tax-related burdens because of employee equities. However, the case is not true when it comes to stock options, and it is a better choice for the firm in terms of employee compensation. Once a corporation has decided on using stock options, it must take into account few aspects. These aspects include cutting down on the overhang and the previous and ongoing expenses. A recommended strategy is using a barrier known as “knockout” where the stock options have a limited time, but the employees would lose the stock if the value of the shares falls below an agreed upon amount. If the value has dropped and remained low for a specified period, then it will only mean that the employee would lose the stocks. Applying the knockout barrier those who are not employed in the firm but are still stockholders do not face the threat of overhang. On yearly disclosure documents, the knockout option always yields to the executive compensation figures being low. The company’s annual proxy would give more accurate earnings, and it would portray a good picture for the shareholders. Despite the fact that knockout options do not provide a solution to every problem, they eliminate a more significant number of obstacles related to compensations based on stock options. It is vital that corporate officials are in constant communication with the auditors about the cons of giving stock options to employees. Learn more: